Why do we need to update public policy?

Copyright 2015 National Mall Coalition
Management of the Mall is divided among 8 federal agencies. There is no meaningful role for the public. CLICK to enlarge.
Copyright 2015 National Mall Coalition
Oversight of Mall matters is divided among 14 Congressional committees and a host of review authorities.  CLICK to enlarge.

Who decides what museums or monuments can be built on the National Mall, what public activities are allowed or forbidden? Why does every new project or development plan seem to get caught up in controversy?

The simple fact is that there is no unified, coordinated entity governing policy for the National Mall. Instead, a myriad of agencies manage the Mall and have plan review authority, while in Congress 14 committees have oversight over Mall matters, as illustrated at left. The result is policies that are uncoordinated and even contradictory. 

Congress in 2003, concerned about overbuilding of memorials on the Mall (but lacking a long-range plan for the Mall in its 3rd century), declared the Mall a “substantially completed work of civic art” but already has made exceptions for a Vietnam Veterans Memorial visitors center, the Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial, and the National Museum of African American History and Culture. Clearly this “completed” policy is not working. 

The various Mall managing agencies develop their own policies that sometimes are contradictory and even contrary to the purpose of the Mall as a public open space. For example, in recent years popular public events such as the Library of Congress’s National Book Festival and the Department of Energy’s Solar Decathlon have been denied permits by the National Park Service in order to protect the Park Service’s new turf grass. But why should protection of the grass trump cultural events? Mall policy should recognize that cultural events such as the Book Festival should be encouraged; they are the lifeblood of the Mall’s meaning.

Federal and DC agencies have at least 5 different Mall definitions
Where exactly is the Mall? No one agrees. The National Register of Historic Places and the National Park Service define the Mall in various, often contradictory ways (green, blue, pink). Congress defines the Mall as the “great cross-axis” (orange), which recognizes the authority of the historic 1791 L’Enfant Plan (white) and 1902 McMillan Plan (yellow). Fragmented, piecemeal planning is the result, threatening the integrity of this nationally significant symbolic landscape and public open space. CLICK to enlarge.

Mall managing agencies cannot even agree on a definition of the Mall — what buildings are on it, what are the boundaries, what is its purpose? Click on the illustration at right and learn more on our Research page.

The American public has no meaningful role in shaping policy matters, as shown in the diagrams — but should. 

The lack of coherent public policy threatens the integrity of the historical Mall and the future vitality of this national treasure. The National Mall Coalition advocates formation of a new McMillan-type commission to look at the Mall holistically and coordinate policy matters. Ultimately, we need to create unified governance –New York City’s Central Park Conservancy is one public-private model — to ensure intelligent, coordinated policy making in the future: How do we define the Mall and understand its meaning in American democracy? Can the Mall ever be “complete” when American history continues to unfold and future generations will want their place on the Mall? How can we bring all Mall constituencies to the table to develop intelligent public policies that support the Mall’s enduring role in our country’s cultural and civic life?

Read our concept for America’s 3rd Century Mall here.

 
 

More Posts in Policy